论坛风格切换切换到宽版
  • 1735阅读
  • 1回复

[转帖]海飞兹:西贝柳斯《D小调小提琴协奏曲》 [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
 

只看楼主 倒序阅读 0 发表于: 2006-05-15

海飞兹:西贝柳斯——D小调小提琴协奏曲(320K)


海飞兹:西贝柳斯《D小调小提琴协奏曲》


[mp=600,45,true]http://www.musicool.cn/xy060512/boris/classical/Heifeta/101.mp3[/mp]


    第一轨 播放 下载
    第二轨 播放 下载
    第三轨 播放 下载


Jean SIBELIUS (1865-1957)
Violin Concerto in D minor Op.47
Chicago Symphony Orchestra/Walter Hendl, recorded January 1959
Sergei PROKOFIEV (1891-1953)
Violin Concerto No. 2 in G minor Op.63
Boston Symphony Orchestra/Charles Munch, recorded February 1959
Alexander GLAZUNOV (1865-1936)
Violin Concerto in A minor Op.82
RCA Victor Symphony Orchestra/Walter Hendl, recorded June 1963
Jascha Heifetz (violin) with accompaniments as above
RCA RED SEAL LIVING STEREO SUPER AUDIO CD 82876 66372 2 [68.55]



    海飞兹的琴艺号称天下无敌手,连最挑剔的名家都对他的演奏甘拜下风。虽然有令人目眩的技巧,可是海飞兹的音乐内涵一样为人称道。此片除了西贝柳斯之外,尚收录了普罗高菲夫的‘小提琴协奏曲第二号’、葛拉祖诺夫‘A小调小提琴协奏曲’,非常值得珍藏。(其它曲目稍后帖出来)

    西贝柳斯的《D小调小提琴协奏曲》

    在西贝柳斯的作品中,《D小调小提琴协奏曲》始终是最受欢迎的一部,它是1903年在一位名叫布梅斯特的友人的影响下创作而成的。此时,西贝柳斯正在欧洲各国漫游、拜访和学习,摸索自己今后创作的方向;他的音乐一如既往仍旧充满了爱国情怀,只是变得更加细腻,更加含蓄,并开始摆脱民族主义风格,逐渐融入二十世纪音乐潮流之中。

    《D小调小提琴协奏曲》就是这一时期的杰作,它也是自帕格尼尼确立小提琴“炫技”传统之后的又一部杰作,对小提琴演奏技巧有着极高的要求,但却不是一部“炫技”之作,在它那华丽与肆意放纵的背后,我们看到的是坚实的核心与心智所显示出的坚韧。而且这一作品并没有涉及芬兰的神话传说和芬兰的景色,它更像一首蕴涵深意的诗歌,出自西贝柳斯的心灵深处。

    可能是由于西贝柳斯认为协奏曲创作过程和发表都太仓促,所以在首演后立刻收回修订,所做的修改篇幅之大几乎使之成为了一部新的作品。这样,1905年,在里夏德·施特劳斯的指挥下,修订版在柏林做了首演,演出非常成功。我们现在听到的通常就是这一修订版本,而第一版本也偶有演奏。

    协奏曲第一乐章的主旋律,是独奏小提琴演奏出的一个哀婉和狂想式的主题,第二主题色彩阴暗,由大提琴和大管演奏。第二乐章是一个柔板乐章,木管乐器演奏出如叹息般的乐声,小提琴唱出哀怨的旋律。然后进入末乐章,一首狂野的舞曲,曾被人称为“北极熊的波兰舞曲”,独奏小提琴的演奏变化无穷,演奏难度极高,而且一个高潮紧接一个高潮,直至结尾一连串辉煌的向上飞掠的旋律。

     这是一部表面上让人觉得冷峻,但内里却激情飞扬的作品,事实上这也是西贝柳斯大部分音乐的突出特点,小提琴大师海菲茨两度录制的这一协奏曲,充分体现了这一特点。海菲茨有小提琴机器之称,其演奏通常强调的是理性,而情感则深埋其中,这样的演奏特别适合西贝柳斯的这部协奏曲,所以在此首先推荐海菲茨的版本(片号:RCA 09026-61744-2)。另外,郑京和或穆特的录音也皆为精彩演奏。





我们的自由天空

分晓·提供




(转自炫音音乐论坛)

n?Gm 5##  
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-15 20:09:25编辑过]

只看该作者 1 发表于: 2006-05-15

看不明白,谁给翻译下(唱片的英文介绍)

Continuing with RCA/BMG product, here is the latest batch of Living Stereo 2 & 3-channel SACD reissues. Remember, it is highly suggested that your surround system have a center front channel as identical as possible to your left and right front speakers in order to realize the enhancement the third channel can provide ...

Heifetz Concertos = SIBELIUS: Violin Concerto in D Minor - with Chicago Sym. Orch./Walter Hendl; PROKOFIEV: Violin Concerto No. 2 in G Minor - with Boston Sym. Orch./Charles Munch; GLAZUNOV: Violin Concerto in A Minor - with RCA Victor Sym. Orch./Walter Hendl - RCA Red Seal Living Stereo 3-channel SACD 82876-66372-2, 68:55 ****:

Heifetz played the premieres of both the Sibelius and Prokofiev concertos and long associated with all three of these works. The original recordings were made in l959 and l963 and have captivated audio buffs ever since their first release in the 60s, and on RCA CD reissues, Classic Records vinyl reissues, and the Sibelius on a recent JVC xrcd reissue.

I compared all of these (except for the original LPs which I don’t have). The Classic vinyl sounded very close to the SACD and in some ways the phantom center channel positioning of Heifetz was in better balance with the orchestra than the three-channel version - the same goes for the CD versions. Heifetz insisted on a rather prominent emphasis on his violin in the mix. However, the glorious silky timbre of his violin actually was more pleasing on either SACD layer than via the vinyl. It was pure pleasure to hear the highest notes of the instrument free from even the slightest digital distortions. The xrcd of the Sibelius suffered from a steely tone of the violin, as heard on the standard CD versions - and perhaps a bit worse due to the greater high end extension of the xrcd option. The orchestras also sounded rather amorphous in their placement of phantom center channel solo instruments other than the violin. With the two-channel SACD the instrumental placement was much more solid and accurate, and the general orchestral timbre was richer sounding. While there was no problem of a too-strong spotlighting of the violin on the two-channel xrcd, it sounded like two violins - one at each L & R speaker - whereas both SACD layers put the violin in dead center and only larger than life rather than morphed into two instruments. After sampling all three of these concertos repeatedly I now enjoy the tuneful Glazunov most of all; this concerto should be on more concert programs. It would be very well-received.

快速回复
限100 字节
 
上一个 下一个